I was casually reading some Esperanto, when suddenly the word “klingon” popped up in the most serious of texts!
I then realised it was simply the word “klingo” (“blade”) with the accusative “n” on the end to mark it as the object of the sentence!
Anyway, it also reminded me of the suffix “ing”, which led me to the topic for this post: the distinction between the suffix “ing” and the suffix “uj”.
Some definitions lead them to be confusingly similar, but in actuality their differences are quite clear. And they’re pretty handy!
Let’s work with the example root “cigar-“. “Cigaro” simply means “(a) cigar”. What happens when we add our suffixes?
- cigaringo = cigar holder
- cigarujo = cigar box/container
“Ing” makes a word which is a holder/sheath for the object described by the root it’s attached to. This’ll often be some structure that the object is partially put in, for holding purposes. E.g. a scabbard for a sword (glavo : glavingo)
Whereas “uj” constructs a word which is a container (usually for storage purposes) for objects described by the root it’s attached to.
And because I enjoy silliness: a “cigaringujo” is a container for cigar holders!
“Uj” happens to have a couple other uses too, if you’re interested!
- When used on a fruit, berry or flower, it often shows the thing upon which that object grows. E.g. a “pomujo” is an “apple tree” from “pomo” = “apple”. Apparently, due to the confusion with “a container for apples”, people are now starting to use “pomarbo” for such things!
- If you’ve got a word like “Anglo” = “Englishman”, you can construct the country name from the people. “Anglujo” is the container for Englishmen “England”!